Opening Context
NCM811 cathode materials are evaluated not only by peak specific capacity, but also by whether the voltage profile, first-cycle efficiency, and electrode loading remain credible under realistic coin-cell screening conditions. For early R&D, a clean half-cell curve helps researchers separate material behavior from later full-cell balancing effects.
Why This Dataset Matters
The slide presents NCM811 cathodes in lithium metal 2320 coin cells tested at 0.1C/0.1C and 25 +/- 1 deg C. The combination of 12 mg/cm2 and 30 mg/cm2 loading, 2.5-4.3 V voltage range, and the stated electrolyte makes the dataset useful for NCM811 loading and dry-electrode comparison. The key value is not only the headline capacity, but the way the voltage curve supports the interpretation.
Figure-Based Analysis
The figure below is the source dataset used for this article.
Figure 1. NCM811 charge-discharge performance dataset.
The reported specific capacity is 210.34 mAh/g and 216.99 mAh/g.
The reported first-cycle efficiency or coulombic efficiency is 88.58% and 92.41%.
The electrode loading is 12 mg/cm2 and 30 mg/cm2.
The voltage profile is technically consistent with the stated NCM811 cathode system. For this dataset, Both electrodes reach above 210 mAh/g, and the dry electrode maintains a strong first-cycle response at higher loading. The Li metal counter electrode and carbonate-based electrolyte electrolyte frame the result as a focused material-screening dataset rather than a final full-cell performance claim.
System-Level Interpretation
From a cathode-engineering perspective, the dataset suggests that NCM811 can sustain a usable charge-discharge response under the stated loading and voltage limits. The curve shape also helps identify whether the material is behaving as expected: plateau-dominant systems should show clear voltage features, while layered oxides often show more sloped profiles as sodium or lithium content changes.
Application Outlook
Based on the shown data, the most realistic near-term use is nickel-rich cathode benchmarking, dry-electrode process validation, and high-energy cell prototyping. Before making final cell-level claims, researchers would normally add repeat-cell statistics, rate capability, longer cycling, impedance growth, electrode density, and full-cell balancing data. Even so, the present curve provides a practical starting point for material selection and electrode-sheet development.
From Materials to Cells
Moving from a single half-cell curve to a working battery requires more than active material capacity. Slurry design, coating uniformity, calendaring density, electrolyte compatibility, separator choice, and pouch-cell format all affect how the same material behaves in a realistic device. That is why material screening, customized electrode sheets, and small-format cell testing should be treated as connected steps in one development workflow.
ATOMFAIR CTA
ATOMFAIR supports battery researchers with high-performance cathode materials, anode materials, customized electrode sheets, pouch cell customization, and related cell testing support. For technical inquiries about battery materials, electrode sheets, or customized pouch-cell development, contact ATOMFAIR at inquiry@atomfair.com.
ATOMFAIR supports global shipping to help research teams access battery materials, cell samples, and testing solutions more efficiently.