Atomfair Brainwave Hub: Nanomaterial Science and Research Primer / Energy Applications of Nanomaterials / Nanomaterials in perovskite solar cells
Advanced nanoscale characterization tools have become indispensable in understanding the structure-property relationships of perovskite solar materials. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and nano-X-ray diffraction (nano-XRD) provide critical insights into crystallinity, phase segregation, and ion migration at sub-100 nm resolution. These techniques enable researchers to correlate nanoscale features with macroscopic device performance while addressing challenges such as beam sensitivity and data interpretation.

Transmission electron microscopy offers atomic-scale resolution for investigating perovskite crystal structures, defects, and interfaces. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) reveals lattice fringes and crystallographic orientations, essential for understanding grain boundaries and strain distribution. Selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns provide phase identification and crystallographic information, while energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) in TEM maps elemental distribution. For perovskite solar cells, TEM has uncovered the presence of non-perovskite phases at grain boundaries, which act as recombination centers and hinder charge transport. Electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) further probes local electronic structure and chemical bonding, offering insights into degradation pathways. However, beam sensitivity remains a challenge, requiring low-dose imaging techniques or cryogenic conditions to minimize damage.

Atomic force microscopy provides topographical and mechanical property mapping with nanometer resolution. Contact mode AFM measures surface roughness and grain morphology, while tapping mode reduces sample damage. Conductive AFM (C-AFM) maps local current flow, identifying charge transport bottlenecks at grain boundaries. Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) measures work function variations, revealing potential fluctuations due to phase segregation or ion migration. For perovskite films, AFM has demonstrated how annealing conditions influence grain size and surface coverage, directly impacting device efficiency. Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) detects ferroelectric domains, which may contribute to current-voltage hysteresis in perovskite solar cells. Challenges include tip-sample convolution effects and the need for careful interpretation of nanoscale electrical properties.

Nano-X-ray diffraction bridges the gap between bulk XRD and atomic-scale TEM, providing phase and strain mapping at tens of nanometers resolution. Using focused X-ray beams from synchrotron sources, nano-XRD scans across perovskite films reveal crystallographic orientation distributions and residual strain. This technique has identified strain gradients near interfaces in multilayer device stacks, which influence charge extraction efficiency. Nano-XRD also detects the formation of secondary phases during operation, such as lead iodide clusters that indicate decomposition. The non-destructive nature of X-rays makes this technique suitable for studying dynamic processes, though the limited penetration depth requires careful sample preparation.

In-situ characterization techniques provide real-time observation of degradation mechanisms in perovskite solar materials. In-situ TEM with heating stages tracks phase transitions and decomposition pathways under thermal stress. Environmental TEM allows observation of moisture-induced degradation at the atomic scale. In-situ AFM combined with light illumination reveals photoinduced morphological changes and ion migration. These studies have shown that halide ion migration occurs through grain boundaries and interfaces, leading to phase segregation under operational conditions. In-situ XRD during thermal annealing optimizes crystallization processes for high-quality films. Challenges include maintaining relevant environmental conditions inside the microscope and correlating accelerated aging tests with real-world degradation rates.

Crystallinity mapping across multiple length scales is critical for optimizing perovskite solar cells. TEM shows that single-crystal domains exhibit superior charge transport compared to polycrystalline regions. Nano-XRD quantifies the degree of preferred orientation in textured films, which enhances charge transport anisotropy. AFM-based infrared spectroscopy (AFM-IR) maps chemical composition with nanoscale resolution, identifying regions of incomplete perovskite conversion. These techniques collectively demonstrate how processing conditions control crystallinity and consequently affect device performance metrics such as open-circuit voltage and fill factor.

Phase segregation in mixed-halide perovskites directly impacts bandgap and stability. TEM-EDS mapping reveals nanoscale halide segregation under illumination, explaining voltage losses in wide-bandgap perovskites. Nano-XRD detects the formation of iodide-rich and bromide-rich phases with distinct lattice parameters. KPFM shows that phase-segregated regions develop different surface potentials, creating energy barriers for charge carriers. These findings have guided compositional engineering strategies to suppress phase segregation through strain management and defect passivation.

Ion migration studies combine multiple techniques to understand this dynamic process. TEM with in-situ biasing visualizes vacancy-mediated ion movement through lattice channels. AFM measures the resulting morphological changes from ion accumulation at interfaces. Time-resolved nano-XRD tracks structural evolution during ion migration, revealing transient phases that form during redistribution. These studies have informed interface engineering approaches to block ion migration pathways and improve operational stability.

Correlating nanoscale features with device performance requires multimodal characterization. Grain boundary chemistry from TEM-EDS correlates with non-radiative recombination losses measured by photoluminescence. Surface potential variations from KPFM align with local open-circuit voltage differences in device measurements. Nano-XRD strain maps explain variations in charge carrier mobility across different film regions. Such correlations enable targeted optimization of specific nanoscale features to improve overall device metrics.

Beam sensitivity presents significant challenges for nanoscale characterization. Perovskites degrade under electron beams, requiring dose rates below 10 e-/Ųs for reliable TEM imaging. Cryogenic cooling to liquid nitrogen temperatures reduces beam damage while maintaining structural information. Fast scanning modes in AFM minimize tip-induced sample modification. Nano-XRD offers reduced damage compared to electrons but requires long acquisition times for high-resolution maps. Advanced data processing algorithms help extract meaningful information from low-dose datasets while minimizing artifacts.

Data interpretation challenges arise from the complex nature of nanoscale measurements. TEM images require careful analysis to distinguish real structural features from artifacts caused by sample preparation or beam damage. AFM measurements must account for tip geometry effects on apparent feature sizes. Nano-XRD data analysis involves sophisticated peak fitting to separate overlapping contributions from multiple phases or strained regions. Multimodal correlation approaches improve confidence in interpretation by cross-validating results from complementary techniques.

Future developments in nanoscale characterization will focus on higher temporal resolution for dynamic processes, improved correlative workflows combining multiple techniques, and advanced data analytics for extracting hidden patterns in large datasets. These advancements will further elucidate the complex structure-property relationships in perovskite solar materials, accelerating the development of stable, high-efficiency devices. The integration of machine learning for automated analysis of nanoscale characterization data promises to uncover new insights into performance-limiting factors and guide materials optimization strategies.
Back to Nanomaterials in perovskite solar cells