Characterization of graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) is critical for understanding their structural and chemical properties, particularly the degree of oxidation and the presence of functional groups. X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) are widely used techniques for this purpose. Each method provides complementary information about the material’s structure, bonding, and oxidation state. Below is a detailed guide to interpreting the spectra of GO and rGO using these techniques, with emphasis on peak assignments and their relation to oxidation levels.
---
**X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis**
XRD is used to determine the interlayer spacing and crystallinity of GO and rGO. The diffraction pattern of GO typically shows a sharp peak at around 10-12° (2θ), corresponding to an interlayer distance of approximately 0.7-0.9 nm. This increased spacing compared to graphite (0.34 nm) is due to the introduction of oxygen-containing functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl, epoxy, carboxyl) between the graphene layers, which disrupt the stacking and expand the interlayer gap.
In contrast, rGO exhibits a broad peak near 24-26° (2θ), indicating a reduced interlayer spacing of about 0.34-0.40 nm. This shift toward higher angles reflects the partial restoration of the graphitic structure as oxygen groups are removed during reduction. The broader peak in rGO also suggests a less ordered stacking arrangement compared to pristine graphite.
Key observations:
- GO: Peak at 10-12° (large interlayer spacing).
- rGO: Peak at 24-26° (reduced interlayer spacing).
---
**Raman Spectroscopy**
Raman spectroscopy provides insights into the structural defects, disorder, and electronic properties of GO and rGO. The most prominent features in the Raman spectra are the D band (~1350 cm⁻¹), the G band (~1580 cm⁻¹), and the 2D band (~2700 cm⁻¹).
- **D band**: Arises from the breathing modes of sp² carbon rings and is activated by structural defects or edges. In GO, the D band is intense due to the high density of defects introduced by oxidation.
- **G band**: Corresponds to the in-plane vibrational mode of sp² carbon atoms. In GO, this band is broadened and shifted to higher wavenumbers (~1600 cm⁻¹) due to the presence of isolated sp² domains surrounded by sp³-hybridized carbons bonded to oxygen.
- **2D band**: Sensitive to stacking order and layer number. In GO, this band is weak or absent due to extensive oxidation-induced disorder.
The intensity ratio of the D and G bands (I_D/I_G) is a useful metric for assessing the degree of disorder. For GO, I_D/I_G is typically high (>1) due to extensive defect formation. Upon reduction to rGO, the I_D/I_G ratio may increase further as small sp² domains are restored, but the overall defect density remains elevated compared to pristine graphene.
Key observations:
- GO: High I_D/I_G ratio, broadened G band, weak 2D band.
- rGO: Increased or similar I_D/I_G ratio, G band shifts back toward 1580 cm⁻¹, partial restoration of 2D band.
---
**Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)**
FTIR identifies the functional groups present in GO and rGO. The spectrum of GO typically shows several characteristic peaks:
- ~3400 cm⁻¹: O-H stretching vibrations from hydroxyl groups or adsorbed water.
- ~1720 cm⁻¹: C=O stretching from carboxyl or carbonyl groups.
- ~1620 cm⁻¹: C=C stretching from residual sp² domains.
- ~1220-1050 cm⁻¹: C-O stretching vibrations (epoxy, alkoxy).
In rGO, the intensity of oxygen-related peaks (e.g., C=O, C-O) decreases significantly, indicating the removal of functional groups during reduction. However, some residual oxygen groups may remain, depending on the reduction method. The C=C peak becomes more prominent as the sp² network is partially restored.
Key observations:
- GO: Strong peaks for O-H, C=O, and C-O.
- rGO: Diminished oxygen-related peaks, enhanced C=C signal.
---
**X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)**
XPS provides quantitative information about the elemental composition and bonding states of carbon and oxygen in GO and rGO. The C1s spectrum of GO can be deconvoluted into several components:
- ~284.5 eV: C=C (sp² carbon).
- ~286.5 eV: C-O (epoxy/hydroxyl).
- ~287.5 eV: C=O (carbonyl).
- ~288.5 eV: O-C=O (carboxyl).
The O1s spectrum shows contributions from:
- ~531.5 eV: C=O.
- ~532.5 eV: C-O.
- ~533.5 eV: O-H (hydroxyl or adsorbed water).
In rGO, the relative intensity of C=C increases, while oxygen-containing peaks (C-O, C=O, O-C=O) decrease. The C/O ratio, a measure of reduction efficiency, rises significantly in rGO compared to GO. For example, GO may have a C/O ratio of ~2, while rGO can reach ~5-10 or higher, depending on the reduction process.
Key observations:
- GO: Dominant oxygen-related peaks in C1s and O1s spectra, low C/O ratio.
- rGO: Enhanced C=C signal, reduced oxygen peaks, higher C/O ratio.
---
**Contrasting GO and rGO Spectra**
The transition from GO to rGO is marked by distinct spectral changes across all four techniques:
1. **XRD**: The interlayer spacing contracts as oxygen groups are removed.
2. **Raman**: The D band remains prominent, but the G band sharpens and shifts back toward graphite-like positions.
3. **FTIR**: Oxygen functional group signals weaken, while sp² carbon vibrations intensify.
4. **XPS**: The C/O ratio increases, and oxygen-bonded carbon species diminish.
These changes collectively confirm the reduction of GO and the partial restoration of graphitic properties in rGO. However, complete recovery of pristine graphene’s structure is rarely achieved, as residual defects and oxygen groups persist.
---
**Summary**
The combined use of XRD, Raman, FTIR, and XPS allows for comprehensive characterization of GO and rGO. XRD reveals interlayer spacing changes, Raman assesses defect density and sp² restoration, FTIR identifies functional groups, and XPS quantifies elemental composition and bonding states. By analyzing these spectra, researchers can determine the oxidation level of GO and monitor the effectiveness of reduction processes in converting GO to rGO. Each technique provides unique insights, and their complementary use ensures a thorough understanding of the material’s chemical and structural evolution.