Atomfair Brainwave Hub: Battery Science and Research Primer / Battery Modeling and Simulation / Thermal modeling
Thermal modeling of lithium-ion batteries under fast-charging conditions is critical for ensuring performance, safety, and longevity. Fast-charging at rates of 3C or higher introduces significant thermal challenges due to increased current densities and associated Joule heating. The non-uniform nature of heat generation and dissipation leads to localized hot spots, which can accelerate degradation or trigger thermal runaway. Accurate thermal modeling must account for anisotropic thermal properties, transient heat generation, and the interplay between electrochemical reactions and thermal effects.

Localized heating is a primary concern in fast-charging scenarios. Heat generation is not uniform across the cell due to variations in current distribution, electrode porosity, and contact resistances. The highest temperatures typically occur near the current collectors and electrode edges, where current densities are greatest. These hot spots can exceed the average cell temperature by 10-20°C, depending on cell design and charging rate. Thermal models must resolve these gradients at sufficiently high spatial resolution to capture critical temperature variations.

Anisotropic thermal conductivity plays a significant role in heat dissipation. Lithium-ion cells exhibit directional dependence in thermal transport due to layered structures. Through-plane thermal conductivity is typically lower than in-plane conductivity by an order of magnitude. For example, a typical pouch cell may have an in-plane conductivity of 20-30 W/m·K but only 1-2 W/m·K through-plane. This anisotropy affects how heat spreads, leading to preferential heat flow along electrode layers rather than through the separator. Models must incorporate these directional properties to avoid underestimating temperature gradients.

Time-resolved simulations are necessary to capture transient thermal behavior during fast-charging. Heat generation rates change dynamically due to shifting internal resistances, state-of-charge-dependent reactions, and temperature feedback effects. A simulation time step of 1-10 seconds is often required to resolve these dynamics accurately. Coarser time steps may miss critical thermal spikes, while excessively fine steps increase computational cost without meaningful gains in accuracy.

The trade-off between model fidelity and computational expense is a key consideration. High-fidelity models use 3D discretization with coupled electrochemical-thermal formulations, resolving individual electrode layers and current collectors. These models provide detailed insights but require significant computational resources, often hours to days for a single fast-charging simulation. Reduced-order models simplify geometry or couple lumped thermal approximations with electrochemical submodels, reducing runtime to minutes while maintaining reasonable accuracy for many applications.

Multi-scale approaches balance these trade-offs by combining detailed submodels for critical regions with coarser representations elsewhere. For example, a fine mesh may be applied near current collectors where gradients are steep, while a coarser mesh suffices for bulk regions. Similarly, time-stepping can adapt dynamically, using smaller steps during peak heating periods and larger steps during slower transients.

Material properties significantly influence model accuracy. Temperature-dependent thermal conductivities, heat capacities, and interfacial resistances must be characterized experimentally for the specific cell design being modeled. Assumptions based on generic values can lead to errors exceeding 5-10°C in predicted temperatures. Empirical measurements under fast-charging conditions are particularly valuable for validating model inputs.

Boundary conditions also require careful treatment. Convective cooling coefficients depend on cooling system design, cell packaging, and environmental factors. Forced air cooling may provide 50-100 W/m²·K, while liquid cooling can exceed 1000 W/m²·K. The model must represent these conditions realistically, including any asymmetry in cooling across cell surfaces.

Electrochemical-thermal coupling introduces additional complexity. Heat generation depends on overpotentials, which are themselves temperature-dependent. This feedback loop means that purely thermal models without electrochemical coupling will underestimate temperature rises at high currents. Fully coupled models solve charge conservation, mass transport, and energy equations simultaneously, though at increased computational cost.

Practical applications of thermal modeling include identifying thermal bottlenecks, optimizing cooling strategies, and evaluating fast-charging limits before physical prototyping. Models can predict how changes in electrode thickness, tab design, or cooling configuration affect peak temperatures and gradients. This capability is valuable for designing cells specifically for fast-charging applications where thermal management is paramount.

Validation against experimental data remains essential. Infrared thermography, embedded thermocouples, or calorimetry provide temperature measurements for comparison with model predictions. Discrepancies often reveal unmodeled phenomena such as contact resistance variations or non-ideal cooling distributions, guiding model refinement.

Future advancements in thermal modeling will likely focus on improving computational efficiency without sacrificing accuracy. Techniques like machine learning-assisted surrogate modeling or adaptive mesh refinement show promise for accelerating simulations while maintaining fidelity. Additionally, better characterization of aging-dependent thermal properties will enable models to predict thermal behavior over a cell's lifetime.

In summary, thermal modeling for fast-charging conditions requires careful consideration of localized heating effects, anisotropic material behavior, and transient dynamics. The choice of modeling approach depends on the specific application, balancing the need for accuracy against computational constraints. As fast-charging technologies advance, robust thermal modeling will remain indispensable for developing safe and reliable high-performance battery systems.
Back to Thermal modeling